Free Trial
Subscription:
China Economic Review
Business Services & Logistics
Consumer Goods & Services
Defence
Consumer Goods & Services
Financial Services
Food & Drink
Healthcare & Medical Devices
Materials & Manufacturing
Regional Markets
Custom Research
Events & Conferences
Contact
About
Terms & Conditions
Privacy
Business Market Research
Energy Market Research
Financial Market Research
Pharmaceutical Market Research
Telecoms Market Research
|
Home > Market Research > Defence > Sea Strike Report
Over the next thirty years the ability of the US Navy to project power over littoral regions anywhere in the world is set to increase dramatically. As the US navy moves towards realising its sea basing concept - where all assets required for a given operation can be deployed from a secure sea based platform - there will be a corresponding increase in the Navy's ability to strike targets deep inland. Budgets have been set. Contracts are being issued. You need to ensure you are a successful part of this market.
Sea strike weapons are the next generation of naval precision strike and fire support weapons. The defining characteristic of sea strike weapons is that they posses the ability or are especially designed to strike land based targets from the sea. This report delivers to you, in one easy-to-read format all you need to know about who is involved in Sea Strike now and for the future.
The benefits of reading this report:
Visiongain projects that the global market for sea strike weapons will be worth $386 billion until 2032. This report gives you an analysis of new, near term and long term sea strike weapons systems and their markets:
. The ships which will deploy Sea Strike weapons - the DD(X) destroyer, CVNX carrier (CVN 21) & littoral combat ships.
. Aircraft such as the F/A 18 Hornet and Joint Strike Fighter
. Air-to-ground and surface-to-surface missiles and munitions
. Gun Systems
. Future Weapons e.g. UCAVs, Electromagnetic Rail Guns and Directed Energy Weapons.
. Rest of the world sea strike weapons
Provided for each type of weapons system:
. Use/function of weapon system
. Technical description of system
. Existing or pending contracts with up to date information
. Likely size of global market
Also included in the report:
. Indepth analysis of new naval doctrines - sea power 21, sea shield, sea base & operational manoeuvre from the sea.
. The geopolitical circumstances behind sea strike weapons
. ForceNet and how ICT is transforming the naval sensor - commander - strike process.
. An appraisal of the total market for sea strike weapons globally
By reading this report you will develop a clear understanding of the nature of sea strike weapons over the next 30 years; why those weapons are needed; and how much each type of weapon system is worth to the global market.
Companies Listed
ADI Ltd.
Aerokosmicheskoe Oborudovanie
Alliant Techsystems
Alvis plc
AMI International
Anteon Corp.
Arinc
Atlantic Marine
Austal Australia
Austal USA
Aviation Holding Company Sukhoi
Avpro
Babcock International Group plc
BAE SYSTEMS plc
Bath Iron Works
Battelle
BearingPoint Inc.
Bechtel Group Inc.
Bharat Electronics Ltd.
Boeing Co.
Boeing-SVS
Booz Allen Hamilton
CAE Inc.
Cobham plc
Computer Sciences Corp.
Cranfield University
Cubic Corp.
Dassault
Dassault Aviation SA
Data Link Soutions
DCN
Defence Evaluation & Research Agency (DERA, UK)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
Denel Pty Ltd. (15)
Diehl Stiftung & Co.
DRS Technologies
EDO Corp.
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Electronic Data Systems Corp.
Elisra Group
Engineered Support Systems Inc.
Ericsson
European Aeronautic, Defence & Space Co.
European Aerospace & Defense Systems (EADS)
FGUP Rosoboroneport
Fincantieri
Finmeccanica SpA
General Accounting Office
General Atomics
General Dynamics Corp.
General Electric Co. (5)
GIAT Industries
GKN Group
Goodrich Engineered Polymer Products
Halliburton Co.
Harris Corporation
Hellenic Aerospace Industry S.A.
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.
Honeywell Inc.
IBM
IHI Aerospace Co. Ltd
Indra Systemas S.A.
Ingalls
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.
Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd.
Itochu Corp.
ITT Industries
IZAR Construcciones Navales S.A.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
John J. McMullen Associates
Kaman Corp.
Kaman Electromagnetics
Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd.
Kentron
Komatsu Ltd.
Kongsberg Gruppen
Korea Aerospace Industries Ltd.
Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co. KG
L-3 Communications Corp.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
ManTech International
Maritime Applied Physics Corporation
Maxwell Laboratories
Meggitt plc
Ministry of Defence (UK)
MITRE Corp.
Mitsubishi Electric Co.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
Naval Sea Systems Command
NEC Corp.
Newport News
Northrop Grumman
Northrop Grumman Space Technology
NPK Irkut
Oshkosh Truck Corp.
Oto Melara
Owego Helo Systems
QinetiQ
Rafael Armament Development Authority
Rand Corporation
Raytheon Co.
Raytheon Missile Systems
Rheinmetall DeTec AG
Rockwell Collins
Rolls-Royce
Ruag Suisse
Russian Aircraft-building Corporation MiG
Saab AB
Saab Aerospace
SAGEM
Salyut
Sandia National Research Laboratories
Science Applications International Corp.
Sikorsky
Silicon Graphics Inc.
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
Smiths Industries plc
Snecma Group
Stewart & Stevenson Services Inc.
Sukhoi
Teledyne Technologies
Tenix Defence Pty Ltd.
Textron Inc.
Thales
The Aerospace Corp.
Titan Corp.
Toshiba Corp.
Ufa MPO
Ultra Electronic Holdings plc
Umoe Mandal
United Defense
United Defense Industries Inc.
United Techologies Corp.
Uralvagonzavod
URS
VT Group
Washington Group International Inc.
Top of Page
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Sea power 21
1.2 Sea strike - a brief overview
1.3 The benefits of this report
2. Sea base and sea shield - supporting sea strike weapons
2.1 Sea base
2.1.2 Sea bases reduce risk
2.1.3 Sea-based logistics
2.1.4 Expanded basing options: Greater operational flexibility
2.2 Sea shield
Table 1 Sea shield characteristics
3. The need for sea power 21
3.1 A new theatre of operations
3.2 The Littoral Zone
3.3 Asymmetric advantage
3.4 Operational Manoeuvre by Sea (OMS) - Towards the new Maritime Pre-Positioning Force (MPF)
3.5 Modularity is key for many future systems
3.6 Ability to strike emerging targets
3.7 Access denial of coalition by Turkey for Operation Iraqi Freedom precipitates need for sea bases and sea strike weapons
3.8 Joint operations from sea base
3.9 Sea base components and infantry capacity are still undetermined.
3.10 The 10-30-30 objective
4. Sea strike
4.1 The vision of sea strike
Table 2 Sea strike characteristics
4.2 Sea strike - speed of effects
4.3 Sea strike: Dominance of information is the enabler
4.4 Sea strike does not have to project lethal force
4.5 Sea strike weapons must be cost effective
Table 3 Sea strike weapons timeline
4.6 S Sea strike weapons - definition
4.7 Sea strike weapons - timeline
5. Sea strike weapons systems: Ships
5.1 Rumsfeld aims to 'skip a generation' in production of new weapons systems
Chart 1 US total naval ship procurement 2003-2009
5.2 Global naval procurement 2005 -2012
Chart 2 Projected value of global naval procurement of surface combatant ships 2003 -20012
Chart 3 Projected numbers of surface combatant ships commissioned globally 2003 - 2012
5.3 US Naval Procurement 2013 -2020
5.4 Asia is the growth area for naval spending while Europe declines
Chart 4 Naval shipbuiling expenditure by major geographic region 2004-2009
5.5 DD(X) class destroyer
5.5.1 DD(X) specifications
5.5.1.1 DD(X) hull
5.5.1.2 DD(X) weapons
5.5.1.3 DD(X) radar and sonar
5.5.1.4 DD(X) propulsion
5.5.2 Advanced Gun System (AGS) for DD(X)
5.5.2.1 AGS provides a new capability - fire support deep into the littorals
5.5.2.2 AGS key features
5.5.2.3 United Defense develops AGS
5.5.2.4 Raytheon develops extended-range guided munitions (ERGM) for AGS
5.5.2.5 Oto Melara test fires naval long range guided munition
5.5.3.6 Alliant Techsystems develops long range naval gun munition
5.5.3 DD(X) class contracts
5.6 CG(X) (CG 21) cruiser
5.7 An Integrated Power System (IPS) for the DD(X) and CG(X)
5.7.1 IPS explained
5.7.2 DRS Technologies to develop IPS for DD(X) Destroyer
5.7.3 Advantages of IPS
5.8 Littoral Combat Ship (LCS)
5.8.1 Cost effective naval ships: The advantage
5.8.2 LCS is cost effective
5.8.3 Modularity makes LCS cost effective
5.8.3.1 Standardised modules/variants of the LCS
5.8.4 76mm Super Rapid Gun for LCS to defend against asymmetric threats
5.8.5 LCS contract phase
5.9 CVNX carrier
5.9.1 Nimitz class expensive to build and run
5.9.2 Cost is an important factor for new carrier
Table 4 Nimitz Class Carrier 50 year life cycle costs
5.9.3 CVNX to deliver a more cost effective carrier
5.9.4 CVNX Future Capabilities
5.9.5 CVNX: A 'plug and play' carrier for the post cold war environment
5.9.6 CVNX Design
5.9.7 CVNX function
5.9.8 CVNX: Nuclear propulsion or not?
5.9.9 Electric launch catapult for aircraft more efficient than steam-driven: Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS)
5.9.9.1 General Atomics to develop EMALS for US Navy
5.10 CVF: New Carrier for Royal Navy
5.10.1 CVF Contract: Problems between BAE Systems and UK MOD
5.10 Asian Countries could enter the market for carriers
Table 5 Counrtries with aircraft carriers
5.10.1 India Purchases Admiral Gorshkov Carrier from Russia
5.10.2 India to deploy home grown carrier by 2010
5.10.3 Israel debates sea strike weapons - a large new amphibious ship or multi mission covettes?
6. Sea strike weapons systems: Aircraft
6.1 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
6.1.1 JSF - a true multi-role aircraft
6.1.1.1 US Navy
6.1.1.2 USMC/ UK Royal Navy
6.1.1.3 US Air Force
6.1.2 Vertical take-off JSF too heavy for Royal Navy?
6.2 F/A 18E/F Super Hornet
6.3 Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs)
6.3.1 Manned Aircraft v UCAVs: The Advantages
6.3.2 UCAV costs
Table 6 Joint Strike Fighter v UCAV in cost terms
6.3.3 UCAVs eliminate risk to pilot
6.3.4 UCAVs: Persistence over target area
6.3.5 Other advantages of UCAVs
6.3.6 UCAV components
6.3.7 UCAV required specifications/ technology limitations
6.3.8 Naval UCAV prototype: Northrop Grumman's X-47 Pegasus
6.3.8.1 Pegasus Specifications
6.3.9 Boeing adapts X-45 UCAV for naval use
6.3.9.1 Boeing X-45C UCAV
6.3.10 Other UCAV/UAV Designs
6.3.10.1 British UCAVs - Proteus and U- 99
6.3.10.2 Swedish SHARC UCAV
6.3.10.3 French AVE UAV
6.3.10.4 South African Seraph UAV
6.3.10.5 EADS UCAV
6.3.10.6 Russian UCAV
6.3.10.7 Israeli UCAV
7. Sea strike weapons systems: Missiles and bombs
7.1 Tactical Tomahawk
Table 7 Tomahawk Block IV Specifications
7.1.1 Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator
7.1.2 Tomahawk Stops the Attacking Regiments (TSTAR)
7.1.3 Royal Navy purchases Tactical Tomahawk Guidance: Terrain Contour
7.1.4 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW)
7.1.5 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM)
Table 8 Tomahawk/JDAM/JSOWUnit-Cost
8. Sea strike weapons systems: Future weapons
8.1.1 Integrated Power System can put massive electrical power at the disposal of weapons systems
8.2 Conventional guns have their limitations
8.3 Kinetic energy and Directed energy weapons
8.4 Kinetic energy weapon: Electromagnetic rail gun
8.4.1 Powering an electromagnetic rail gun
8.4.2 Electromagnetic rail gun barrel/projectile propulsion
8.4.3 Challenges in developing electromagnetic rail guns
8.4.4 The advantages of electromagnetic rail guns
Chart 6 EM gun impact energy/projectile mass
Chart 7 EM gun range/projectile mass/launch velocity
Chart 8 EM gun impact velocity/projectile mass
8.5 Directed Energy Weapons
8.5.1 The advantages of directed energy weapons
8.6 Microwave pulse weapons
8.6.1 Microwave pulse to disable electronic systems
8.6.2 Microwave pulse weapons should not be confused with electronic warfare systems
8.6.3 Microwave pulse as a beam
8.6.4 Microwave pulse weapon for missile defence
8.6.5 Microwave pulse weapons from unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAV)
8.6.6 Other potential applications of microwave pulse weapons
8.6.7 Microwave pulse: An 'unlethal' weapon to incapacitate troops?
8.6.8 US military systems at risk from microwave pulses
8.6.9 Challenges posed in developing microwave pulse weapons
8.7 High Energy Laser (HEL) and Aerospace Relay Mirror System (ARMS)
8.7.1 Types of lasers for directed energy weapons
8.7.1.1 Chemical Lasers
8.7.1.2 Solid-state lasers
8.7.1.3 Free-Electron Lasers
8.7.2 Adaptive Optics
8.7.3 US and Israel develop Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser (MTHEL)
8.7.4 Aerospace Relay Mirror System (ARMS) could enable HELs as a sea strike weapons
9. Forcenet
Table 9 ForeNet characteristics
9.1 ForceNet Aims
Table 10 The broad industrial areas for battlespace awareness
9.2 The capabilities of ForceNet
9.3 Forcenet sensor grid
9.4 Forcenet delivers information needed, when it is needed
9.5 ForceNet facilitates joint interoperability
9.6 How Forcenet has already transformed operations
9.7 Expanded Targeting Devices and Sensor Fusion
9.7.1 Acoustic Sensing
9.7.2 Chemical, biological, radiological and Nuclear Event (CBRNE) Sensing
9.7.3 Combination Sensing
9.7.4 Electro-Optical Sensing
9.7.5 Environmental Sensing
9.7.6 Hyperspectral Sensing
9.7.7 Information Technology
9.7.8 Infrared (IR) Sensing
9.7.9 Laser Sensors
9.7.10 Magnetic Sensing
9.7.11 Microwave Sensing
9.7.12 Other Imaging
9.7.13 Radar
9.7.14 Radio Frequency (RF) Sensing
9.7.15 Sonar
9.7.16 Timing and Geopositional Devices
9.8 Encryption technologies - Tactical Data Links
9.8.1 The Link 16 system
9.8.1.1 Thales develops Link 16 system for UK Sea King AEW MK 7 and RN Ships
9.8.1.2 IBM provides Royal Navy with a Data Links Processing System (DLPS)
9.8.1.3 JTIDS Link 16 specifications
9.8.1.4 Data Link Solutions Develops TDLs for US Forces
9.8.1.5 Link 22
9.8.1.6 ViaSat develops Link 22 for NATO
10. Conclusion and Market Analysis
Chart 9 World military spending 2005
10.1 Sea strike weapons market analysis 2003 -2032
Chart 10 Sea strike weapons global market share 2003-2032
Table 11 Sea strike weapons global market value 2003-2032
Table 12 World military spending 2005 (latest figures available) $ billions
10.2 Sea strike destroyer market (e.g. DD(X)) 2013-2021
Chart 11 Sea strike destroyer market (e.g. DD(X)) 2013-2021
10.3 Sea strike aircraft carrier market 2013 -2021
Chart 12 Sea strike aircraft carrier market 2013 -2021
10.4 Small surface combatant market (e.g littoral combat ship) 2013-2021
Chart 13 Small surface combatant market (e.g littoral combat ship) 2013-2021
10.5 Naval air superiority fighter market (e.g Joint Strike Fighter 2013- 2021)
Chart 14 Naval air superiority fighter market (e.g Joint Strike Fighter 2013- 2021)
10.6 Naval UCAV market 2013 -2032
Chart 15 Naval UCAV market 2013 -2032
10.7 Global Missile Market
10.7.1 The market for munitions tailkits (e.g.JDAM) 2003-2011
Chart 16 The market for munitions tailkits (e.g.JDAM) 2003-2011
10.7.2 The market for guided air launched surface - to ground glide munitions (e.g. JSOW)
Chart 17 The market for guided air launched surface - to ground glide munitions (e.g. JSOW)
10.7.3 The market for sea - launched cruise missiles (e.g. Tactical Tomahawk) 2003-2011
Chart 18 The market for sea - launched cruise missiles (e.g. Tactical Tomahawk) 2003-2011
10.8 Fire support weapons market 2003 -2032
10.8.1 The market for naval guided gun fired munitions (eg.ERGM) 2003- 2011
Chart 19 The market for naval guided gun fired munitions (eg.ERGM) 2003- 2011
10.8.2 The Market for Directed and Kinetic Energy Weapons 2013-2032
Chart 20 The Market for Directed and Kinetic Energy Weapons 2013-2032
For full details, please email keithw@cmsinfo.com
Top of Page
Buy now!
Top of Page
|
|
